# US 10,321,401 B2 · Clear-to-send (CTS) power control in sidelink > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,321,401 B2 - Document ID: US10321401B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 15/389,320 - Filed: 2016-12-22 - Published: 2018-02-15 - Granted: 2019-06-11 - Earliest claimed: 2016-08-12 - Assignees: QUALCOMM Incorporated - Applicants: QUALCOMM Incorporated - Inventors: Chong Li; Junyi Li; Piyush Gupta - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10321401B2 ## CPC - H04W 52/0235: {where the received signal is a power saving command} - H04W 52/243: {taking into account interferences} - H04W 52/246: {where the output power of a terminal is based on a path parameter calculated in said terminal} - H04W 52/325: {Power control of control or pilot channels} - H04W 52/383: {power control in peer-to-peer links} - H04W 72/54: based on quality criteria - H04W 74/0816: with collision avoidance - H04W 76/14: Direct-mode setup - H04W 92/18: between terminal devices - H04W 52/245: {taking into account received signal strength} - H04W 52/265: {taking into account the quality of service QoS} - H04W 52/281: {taking into account user or data type priority} - H04W 74/002: {Transmission of channel access control information} - H04W 88/02: Terminal devices - H04W 88/08: Access point devices - Y02D 30/70: in wireless communication networks - H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72) - Y02D: CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE ## Abstract A first device may configure a second device, such as a sidelink receiver, so that an interference protection zone surrounding the second device may be dynamically adjusted in size based, for example, on various objectives and/or use cases recognized by the first device. The interference protection zone may be, for example, an area surrounding the second device, within which neighboring devices may be silenced. Changes to the interference protection zone may be achieved by providing a dynamic clear-to-send (CTS) transmit power scaling parameter, that is different from a pre-assigned constant parameter for CTS power control stored at the second device, to the second device from the first device. The second device may calculate CTS channel power using at least the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter and the received RTS channel power. The second device may send a CTS message in a CTS channel at the calculated CTS channel power. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method of communication by a sidelink receiver device, the method comprising: receiving a ready-to-send (RTS) message in an RTS channel at a received RTS channel power; receiving a different dynamic clear-to-send (CTS) transmit power scaling parameter each transmission time interval that is also different from a pre-assigned constant parameter for CTS power control stored at the sidelink receiver device and is a multiplier used to increase or decrease CTS channel power on a transmission time interval (TTI)-by-TTI basis and is changed on the TTI-by-TTI basis; generating a CTS message responsive to the RTS message; calculating a CTS channel power as a function of at least the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter and the received RTS channel power; and sending the CTS message in a CTS channel at the calculated CTS channel power. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: receiving the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter from at least one of: a scheduling entity via a radio resource control (RRC) message, the scheduling entity via a control channel message, or a sidelink transmitter via the RTS message. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, wherein the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter is a multiplier used to increase or decrease a size of a CTS channel interference protection zone on the TTI-by-TTI basis. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method of claim 1, further comprising: changing the CTS channel power, relative to a power that would be obtained as a function of the pre-assigned constant parameter for CTS power control stored at the sidelink receiver device and the received RTS channel power, to dynamically increase or decrease a size of a CTS channel interference protection zone. ### Claim 5 An apparatus for wireless communication, configured as a sidelink receiver device, comprising: a processor; a transceiver communicatively coupled to the processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, wherein the memory stores instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to be configured to: receive, at the sidelink receiver device, a ready-to-send (RTS) message in an RTS channel at a received RTS channel power; receive a different dynamic clear-to-send (CTS) transmit power scaling parameter each transmission time interval that is also different from a pre-assigned constant parameter for CTS power control stored at the sidelink receiver device and is a multiplier used to increase or decrease CTS channel power on a transmission time interval (TTI)-by-TTI basis and is changed on the TTI-by-TTI basis; generate a CTS message responsive to the RTS message; calculate a CTS channel power as a function of at least the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter and the received RTS channel power; and send the CTS message in a CTS channel at the CTS channel power via the transceiver. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the processor is further configured to: receive the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter from at least one of: a scheduling entity via a radio resource control (RRC) message, the scheduling entity via a control channel message, or a sidelink transmitter via the RTS message. ### Claim 7 (depends on 5) The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the processor is further configured to: change the CTS channel power, relative to a power that would be obtained as a function of the pre-assigned constant parameter for CTS power control stored at the sidelink receiver device and the received RTS channel power, to dynamically increase or decrease a size of a CTS channel interference protection zone. ### Claim 8 A method of communication by a transmitting device, the method comprising: determining to change a size of a clear-to-send (CTS) interference protection zone of at least one scheduled entity in a plurality of scheduled entities; determining a value of a dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter, wherein the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter is used to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone by scaling a transmit power of the at least one scheduled entity during a CTS channel, is re-determined to change the value of the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter on a transmission time interval (TTI)-by-TTI basis, is a multiplier used to increase or decrease CTS channel power, and is sent to the scheduled entity on the TTI-by-TTI basis; and sending the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter to the at least one scheduled entity. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein the transmitting device is a scheduling entity or a sidelink transmitter device. ### Claim 10 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein, when the transmitting device is a scheduling entity, the method further comprises: sending a grant to authorize device-to-device communication among the plurality of scheduled entities, the grant allocating a clear-to-send (CTS) channel. ### Claim 11 (depends on 10) The method of claim 10, further comprising: sending the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter via a radio resource control (RRC) message or via a control channel allocated by the grant. ### Claim 12 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein, when the transmitting device is a scheduling entity, the method further comprises: determining to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on a change to a reliability requirement of a link associated with the scheduled entity. ### Claim 13 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein, when the transmitting device is a scheduling entity, the method further comprises: determining to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on an evaluation of a link traffic profile, wherein the link traffic profile indicates at least one of a reliability or a latency requirement of a link associated with the scheduled entity. ### Claim 14 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein, when the transmitting device is a scheduling entity, the method further comprises: determining the value of the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter based on at least one of a use case, priority, quality of service (QoS), or buffer status. ### Claim 15 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein when the transmitting device is a sidelink transmitter device linked in device-to-device communication with a sidelink receiver device, the method further comprises: determining to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on a change to at least one of a reliability or a latency requirement of a packet of data to be transported to the sidelink receiver device. ### Claim 16 (depends on 8) The method of claim 8, wherein when the transmitting device is a sidelink transmitter device linked in device-to-device communication with a sidelink receiver device, the method further comprises: determining to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on an evaluation of an amount of data to be transported to the to the sidelink receiver device. ### Claim 17 An apparatus for wireless communication, comprising: a processor; a transceiver communicatively coupled to the processor; and a memory communicatively coupled to the processor, wherein the memory stores instructions that when executed by the processor cause the processor to be configured to: determine to change a size of a clear-to-send (CTS) interference protection zone of at least one scheduled entity in a plurality of scheduled entities; determine a value of a dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter, wherein the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter is used to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone by scaling a transmit power of the at least one scheduled entity during a CTS channel, is re-determined to change the value of the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter on a transmission time interval (TTI)-by-TTI basis, is a multiplier used to increase or decrease CTS channel power, and is sent to the scheduled entity on the TTI-by-TTI basis; and send the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter to the at least one scheduled entity via the transceiver. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the apparatus is a scheduling entity or a sidelink transmitter device. ### Claim 19 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein, when the apparatus is a scheduling entity, the processor is further configured to: send a grant to authorize device-to-device communication among the plurality of scheduled entities, the grant allocating a clear-to-send (CTS) channel. ### Claim 20 (depends on 19) The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the processor is further configured to: send the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter via a radio resource control (RRC) message or via a control channel allocated by the grant. ### Claim 21 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein, when the apparatus is a scheduling entity, the processor is further configured to: determine to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on a change to a reliability requirement of a link associated with the scheduled entity. ### Claim 22 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein, when the apparatus is a scheduling entity, the processor is further configured to: determine to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on an evaluation of a link traffic profile, wherein the link traffic profile indicates at least one of a reliability or a latency requirement of a link associated with the scheduled entity. ### Claim 23 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein, when the apparatus is a scheduling entity, the processor is further configured to: determine the value of the dynamic CTS transmit power scaling parameter based on at least one of a use case, priority, quality of service (QoS), or buffer status. ### Claim 24 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the apparatus is a sidelink transmitter device linked in device-to-device communication with a sidelink receiver device, the processor is further configured to: determine to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on a change to at least one of a reliability or a latency requirement of a packet of data to be transported to the sidelink receiver device. ### Claim 25 (depends on 17) The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the apparatus is a sidelink transmitter device linked in device-to-device communication with a sidelink receiver device, the processor is further configured to: determine to change the size of the CTS interference protection zone based on an evaluation of an amount of data to be transported to the to the sidelink receiver device.