# US 10,320,449 B2 · Dynamic cell clustering for coordinated multipoint operation > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,320,449 B2 - Document ID: US10320449B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 15/308,244 - Filed: 2014-05-08 - Published: 2017-02-23 - Granted: 2019-06-11 - Earliest claimed: 2014-05-08 - Assignees: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy - Applicants: Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy - Inventors: Balamurali Natarajan; Anand Bedekar; Suresh Kalyanasundaram; Rajeev Agrawal; Xiaoyi Wang; Hans Kroener; Jani Matti Johannes Moilanen - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10320449B2 ## CPC - H04B 7/024: Co-operative use of antennas of several sites, e.g. in co-ordinated multipoint or co-operative multiple-input multiple-output [MIMO] systems - H04J 11/0093: {Neighbour cell search} - H04L 47/29: {using a combination of thresholds} - H04W 16/10: Dynamic resource partitioning - H04W 92/20: between access points - H04B: TRANSMISSION - H04J: MULTIPLEX COMMUNICATION (transmission in general H04B; peculiar to transmission of digital information H04L5/00; systems for the simultaneous or sequential transmission of more than one television signal H04N7/08; in exchanges H04Q11/00; stereophonic systems H04S) - H04L: TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION (arrangements common to telegraphic and telephonic communication H04M) - H04W: WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS (broadcast communication H04H; communication systems using wireless links for non-selective communication, e.g. wireless extensions H04M1/72) ## Abstract The present invention addresses method, apparatus and computer program product for dynamic cell clustering for Coordinated Multipoint operation. Clustering metric information defining relevant metrics for making cell clustering decision for Coordinated Multipoint operation are received from a network element serving a neighboring cell, and based on the received clustering metric information, it is decided whether to include the neighboring cell to a cluster for Coordinated Multipoint operation. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method for controlling an own cell, comprising: receiving clustering metric information defining relevant metrics for making cell clustering decision for coordinated multipoint operation from a network element serving a neighboring cell, wherein the clustering metric information comprises a number or fraction of cell-edge coordinated multipoint enabled user equipments in the neighboring cell that consider the own cell as one of its top M interferers, where M>=1; and deciding, based on the received clustering metric information, whether to include the neighboring cell to a cluster for coordinated multipoint operation. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, wherein the clustering metric information further comprises information corresponding to at least one of: backhaul load, congestion in the backhaul, cost for exchanging the clustering metric information over the backhaul, quality of service provided to the message exchange, reference signal received power measurements of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, a reported channel quality indicator value of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, and at least one of: a number or fraction of hand-ins from neighbor cells, and a number or fraction of hand-outs to neighbor cells. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, wherein the clustering metric information is received from all neighboring cells, and the decision whether to include each respective neighboring cell is based on the clustering metric information of all neighboring cells. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1, wherein the transmission of the clustering metric information is initiated by transmitting a cluster inclusion response message to the neighboring cell upon reception of a cluster inclusion request message from the neighboring cell. ### Claim 5 (depends on 4) The method according to claim 4, wherein, if the cluster inclusion response message denies to include the neighboring cell in the coordinated multipoint cluster of the own cell, then the cluster inclusion response message indicates to the neighboring cell to not to send further cluster inclusion request messages to the own cell for at least a predetermined duration. ### Claim 6 (depends on 4) The method according to claim 4, wherein at least one of the cluster inclusion request, the cluster inclusion response, and the clustering metric information includes a timestamp for detecting the backhaul delay. ### Claim 7 An apparatus for controlling an own cell comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory including computer program code; the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: receive clustering metric information defining relevant metrics for making cell clustering decision for coordinated multipoint operation from a network element serving a neighboring cell, wherein the clustering metric information comprises a number or fraction of cell-edge coordinated multipoint enabled user equipments in the neighboring cell that consider the own cell as one of its top M interferers, where M>=1; and decide, based on the received clustering metric information, whether to include the neighboring cell to a cluster for coordinated multipoint operation. ### Claim 8 (depends on 7) The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the clustering metric information further comprises information about at least one of: backhaul load, congestion in the backhaul, cost for exchanging the clustering metric information over the backhaul, quality of service provided to the message exchange, reference signal received power measurements of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, a reported channel quality indicator value of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, and at least one of: a number or fraction of hand-ins from neighbor cells, and a number or fraction of hand-outs to neighbor cells. ### Claim 9 (depends on 8) The apparatus according to claim 8, wherein the clustering metric information further comprises information about at least one of: a number or fraction of cell-edge coordinated multipoint enabled user equipments in the neighboring cell, and an increase in sum utility of user equipments in the neighboring cell due to a cooperation with the own cell. ### Claim 10 (depends on 7) The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: receive clustering metric information from all neighboring cells, and to base the decision whether to include each respective neighboring cell is on the clustering metric information of all neighboring cells. ### Claim 11 (depends on 7) The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the transmission of the clustering metric information is initiated by transmitting a cluster inclusion response message to the neighboring cell upon reception of a cluster inclusion request message from the neighboring cell. ### Claim 12 (depends on 11) The apparatus according to claim 11, wherein, if the cluster inclusion response message denies to include the neighboring cell in the coordinated multipoint cluster of the own cell, then the cluster inclusion response message indicates to the neighboring cell to not to send further cluster inclusion request messages to the own cell for at least a predetermined duration. ### Claim 13 (depends on 11) The apparatus according to claim 11, wherein at least one of the cluster inclusion request, the cluster inclusion response, and the clustering metric information includes a timestamp for detecting the backhaul delay. ### Claim 14 (depends on 7) The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus further to: when the apparatus has decided to include the neighboring cell to the cluster, cause transmission of a cluster selection decision message indicating inclusion of the neighboring cell to the cluster to the network element serving the neighboring cell. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The apparatus according to claim 14, wherein, upon reception of a response indicating acceptance to include the neighboring cell to the cluster, coordinated multipoint cooperation between the own cell and the neighboring cell is initiated. ### Claim 16 (depends on 7) The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein, the at least one memory and the computer program code are configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus further to: when the own cell, based on the clustering metrics sent by a neighbor cell that is part of the Coordinated Multipoint cluster, determines that the clustering metrics do not meet predetermined properties, cause transmission of a message indicating dropping the neighbor cell from the own cell's Coordinated Multipoint cluster to the neighbor cell, for causing, in the neighbor cell, reconfiguration of the coordinated multipoint set of its served user equipments to not include the own cell. ### Claim 17 An apparatus comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory including computer program code; the at least one memory and the computer program code configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: compose clustering metric information defining relevant metrics for making cell clustering decision for coordinated multipoint operation involving an own cell, wherein the clustering metric information comprises a number or fraction of cell-edge coordinated multipoint enabled user equipments in the neighboring cell that consider the own cell as one of its top M interferers, where M>=1; and cause transmission of the clustering metric information to a network element of a neighboring cell. ### Claim 18 (depends on 17) The apparatus according to claim 17, wherein the clustering metric information comprises information about at least one of: backhaul load, congestion in the backhaul, cost for exchanging the clustering metric information over the backhaul, quality of service provided to the message exchange, and reference signal received power measurements of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, a reported channel quality indicator value of a user equipment in the neighboring cell and/or the own cell, and at least one of: a number or fraction of hand-ins from neighbor cells, and a number or fraction of hand-outs to neighbor cells. ### Claim 19 (depends on 18) The apparatus according to claim 18, wherein the clustering metric information further comprises information about at least one of: a number or fraction of cell-edge coordinated multipoint enabled user equipments in the own cell, and an increase in sum utility of user equipments in the own cell due to a cooperation with the neighboring cell. ### Claim 20 (depends on 17) The apparatus according to claim 17, wherein the at least one memory and the computer program code are further configured to, with the at least one processor, cause the apparatus at least to: initiate composing the clustering metric information by at least one of: receiving a message indicating a cluster is to be formed from the network element of the neighboring cell, detecting that the composed metric is larger than a first preset threshold, and the time since the last time the clustering metric was sent is longer than a second preset threshold.