# US 10,118,201 B2 · Inspection and sorting machine > Agents: this data is available as JSON from the patentgrep API and MCP server — see https://patentgrep.com/llms.txt - Number: US 10,118,201 B2 - Document ID: US10118201B2 - Status: Granted - Kind: B2 - Application number: 15/643,668 - Filed: 2017-07-07 - Published: 2017-10-26 - Granted: 2018-11-06 - Earliest claimed: 2015-08-03 - Assignees: Linear Group Services, LLC - Applicants: Linear Group Services, LLC - Inventors: James P. DeFillipi; Larry N. Wright - Web page: https://patentgrep.com/patent/US10118201B2 ## CPC - B07C 5/363: {by means of air} - B07C 5/02: Measures preceding sorting, e.g. arranging articles in a stream orientating {(sorting and transport of caps B67B3/06)} - B07C 5/10: measured by light-responsive means {(sorting according to colour B07C5/342)} - B07C 5/342: according to optical properties, e.g. colour {(according to radiation transmittivity B07C5/3416)} - B07C: POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING (specially adapted for a specific purpose covered by another class, see the relevant place, e.g. A43D33/06, B23Q7/12) ## Abstract An inspection and sorting machine and a related method of operation are provided. The inspection and sorting machine includes an inspection system that outputs a first signal corresponding to a fastener condition and a second signal corresponding to an inspection condition. Based on the inspection system output, a controller determines whether a fastener is classified as conforming or whether the fastener is classified as undetermined. Conforming fasteners are diverted into a conforming parts chute, and undetermined fasteners are diverted into a recirculated parts chute. The remaining fasteners are diverted into a reject chute. The undetermined fasteners are recirculated into the inspection and sorting machine for re-inspection. ## Claims ### Claim 1 A method comprising: providing a plurality of fasteners; transporting the plurality of fasteners in a product stream, each of the plurality of fasteners being directed through an inspection system; performing an optical inspection of the plurality of fasteners in the product stream as the plurality of fasteners are directed through the inspection system; determining, for each of the plurality of fasteners, whether the optical inspection is impeded by a system fault; classifying, using a central controller, each of the plurality of fasteners having undergone the optical inspection without a system fault; selectively sorting, into a first chute or a second chute, fasteners having undergone the optical inspection without a system fault; and receiving, into a third chute for recirculation through the inspection system, fasteners for which the optical inspection included a system fault, wherein transporting the plurality of fasteners is performed by a lower conveyor for optical inspection of a first fastener surface and is further performed by an upper conveyor for optical inspection of a second fastener surface. ### Claim 2 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein performing an optical inspection includes, for each of the plurality of fasteners, imaging the first fastener surface and imaging the second fastener surface using first and second cameras, respectively. ### Claim 3 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein the system fault is based on a defect in at least one of fastener orientation, fastener spacing, fastener speed, and fastener visibility. ### Claim 4 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein the system fault is based on controller overrun or controller inoperability. ### Claim 5 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein the classifying step includes classifying each of the plurality of fasteners as conforming, undetermined, or non-conforming. ### Claim 6 (depends on 5) The method according to claim 5 wherein the central controller includes a registry for each of the plurality of fasteners and wherein the classifying step includes updating the registry for each fastener as conforming, undetermined, or non-conforming. ### Claim 7 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein the sorting step includes ejecting each of the plurality of fasteners into the first chute or into the second chute. ### Claim 8 (depends on 1) The method according to claim 1 wherein the third chute terminates at a hopper that feeds the plurality of fasteners to a lower conveyor. ### Claim 9 An inspection and sorting machine comprising: a feed system adapted to transport a plurality of fasteners in a product stream, wherein the feed system includes a lower conveyor that positions the plurality of fasteners for optical inspection of a first fastener surface and wherein the feed system includes an upper conveyor that positions the plurality of fasteners for optical inspection of a second fastener surface; an inspection system adapted to perform an optical inspection of each of the plurality of fasteners, the inspection system including first and second cameras and an inspection controller, the inspection controller providing an output; a central controller in electrical communication with the inspection controller output and adapted to classify each of the plurality of fasteners that undergo an optical inspection without a system fault; and a sorting system including: first and second chutes to selectively receive fasteners that undergo an optical inspection without a system fault, and a third chute to accept fasteners for which the optical inspection includes a system fault for recirculation through the inspection system. ### Claim 10 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the first camera is positioned to image the first fastener surface and wherein the second camera is positioned to image the second fastener surface. ### Claim 11 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the system fault is based on a defect in at least one of fastener orientation, fastener spacing, fastener speed, and fastener visibility. ### Claim 12 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the system fault is based on inspection controller overrun or inspection controller inoperability. ### Claim 13 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the central computer is adapted to classify each of the plurality of fasteners as conforming, undetermined, or non-conforming in a registry stored to computer readable memory. ### Claim 14 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the sorting system further includes first and second ejectors. ### Claim 15 (depends on 14) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 14 wherein the first and second ejectors include first and second pneumatic air nozzles that are responsive to the central controller. ### Claim 16 (depends on 9) The inspection and sorting machine of claim 9 wherein the third chute terminates at a hopper that feeds the plurality of fasteners to a lower conveyor.