Systems and methods for providing security via interactive media
AssigneeGanalila, LLC
InventorsShreedhar Natarajan, Jaisree Moorthy
Life of this patent
Estimating the term…
Loading patent…
AssigneeGanalila, LLC
InventorsShreedhar Natarajan, Jaisree Moorthy
Estimating the term…
Methods and systems for providing security and verifying a human user and/or an authorized user are described. A system may include a processor and a non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium. The non-transitory, processor-readable storage medium may include one or more programming instructions that, when executed, cause the processor to receive a request to access a secured resource, provide a verification challenge to a user via a user interface, receive at least one input from the user in response to the verification challenge, and determine that the at least one input corresponds to at least one parameter indicative of a human user. The verification challenge may include a game.
A system comprising:
A system comprising:
A method comprising:
A method comprising:
Dependencies are inferred from the claim text.
Drawings are temporarily unavailable. Open the PDF at USPTO
From the US filing history. Foreign family members aren’t listed.
Network architectures or network communication protocols for network security: for controlling access to devices or network resources
Involving additional visual information provided to the game scene, e.g. by overlay to simulate a head-up display [HUD] or displaying a laser…:…
Interaction techniques based on graphical user interfaces [GUI]: for the control of specific functions or operations, e.g. selecting or…
Authentication, i.e. establishing the identity or authorisation of security principals: user authentication
About 7 years 4 months of term left · ends 11 Mar 2034 (estimated)
Personal security, particularly with respect to the Internet, has been a primary concern for individuals and business that conduct activities online. Entities devoted to security subversion have become increasingly sophisticated and have been able to circumvent some of the strongest security measures in the world. Accordingly, there exists a constant need for improved security measures.
Illustrative methods of subverting security measures may involve using one or more computing systems, such as a bot, a botnet, and/or the like, to generate an attack. Such methods can be particularly useful in using automated techniques to guess passwords. Previous attempts to prevent such automated techniques have resulted in security measures that use challenge-response testing to determine whether an entity requesting access to an account is a human or a computing system. Such challenge-response testing generally requires an entity to enter characters from a distorted image to verify that the entity is a human user. For a time, the challenge-response testing was successful in verifying an entity was human. However, advances in computing technology have made such challenge-response testing less effective.
Other illustrative methods of subverting security measures may include unauthorized users posing as authorized users to gain access to a secured resource. In such methods, the unauthorized user may have information pertinent to an authorized user that is used to “trick” the security measures into allowing the unauthorized user access to the secured resource. Current methods include requiring an authorized user to provide additional security information when setting up an account, such as, for example, a mother's maiden name, a name of a dog, an old address, and/or the like. However, such information is easily obtainable by unauthorized users.
FIG. 1 depicts a flow diagram of an illustrative method of verifying a human user according to an embodiment.
FIG. 2 depicts a flow diagram of a second illustrative method of verifying a human user according to an embodiment.
FIG. 3 depicts a flow diagram of a third illustrative method of verifying a human user according to an embodiment.
This disclosure is not limited to the particular systems, devices and methods described, as these may vary. The terminology used in the description is for the purpose of describing the particular versions or embodiments only, and is not intended to limit the scope.
As used in this document, the singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural references unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meanings as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. Nothing in this disclosure is to be construed as an admission that the embodiments described in this disclosure are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. As used in this document, the term “comprising” means “including, but not limited to.”
The following terms shall have, for the purposes of this application, the respective meanings set forth below.